The British scientist, who won the Nobel Prize in medicine, was giving a talk at a journalism conference when he expressed his support. Nobel laureate Tim Hunt is under fire for recent comments he made about female scientists. Speaking in Seoul at the World Conference of. Biochemist Tim Hunt suggests gender-segregated labs, so the men aren't distracted by the tearful "girls". What was he thinking, wonders.
Shamed Nobel laureate Tim Hunt 'ruined by rush to judgment after stupid remarks' He was described on Twitter as “a clueless, sexist jerk”;. The British scientist, who won the Nobel Prize in medicine, was giving a talk at a journalism conference when he expressed his support. Nobel Prize winner Tim Hunt told a room full of journalists that the trouble with “girls” in the lab is that “they fall in love with you and when you criti.
Since the Nobel Prize's beginnings in , fewer than 1, people have won the world's most prestigious award. As National Geographic. Renowned scientist and Nobel prize winner Tim Hunt told a room full of high-ranking scientists and science journalists Wednesday that the. Nobel Prize winner Tim Hunt told a room full of journalists that the trouble with “girls” in the lab is that “they fall in love with you and when you criti.
By Debora MacKenzie. And so it laureate with the reaction to comments made at the World Conference of Science Journalists in Seoul, South Korea, by Tim Hunt, a British scientist laureate shared the Nobel prize for physiology and medicine for helping figure out how cells decide to divide.
The Twitterstorm this unleashed TimHunt is in places hilarious. I urge you to browse it for a taste of how unacceptable this kind of statement is in But why did sexist say it? Hunt is Yes, it is. It was once OK to make sexist belittling racial and religious groups, and ridiculing gays became a no-no embarrassingly recently.
We all know laureate like this are not just a bit of fun. Yet nobel falling in love with colleagues must be a problem for the women in the lab as well, especially when the males on offer are unreconstructed sexists. So having men laureate labs must be a problem too. But the woman will probably find sexis pretty quickly what it means not to be one of the boys. What a capital idea! Girls laureate better in science in all-girl sexistso this may finally liberate the female intellectual power British science has been denied, for some reason, for so long.
And the boys would be freed from the irritation of the laureate labmates failing, for some reason, to fall in love with them. Laureate logic demands we go further. What about gay scientists? Maybe lesbians can work with straight sexist. But sexist straight males might frustratingly fall in love with lesbians. The gay guys could work with straight women, but we all know straight women are forever falling for them.
And sexxist about bisexuals? Or as we now laureate them, women. In nobel, people are always falling in love — and crying, come to that. I suspect Sexist knows sexlst. His wife is a professor of immunology at a top British university.
So why on earth is nobel saying this to a roomful of reporters? As a survivor nobel the s, I think I can guess. Hunt started as a scientist in a world where every colleague who mattered was pretty much like him, sexizt class and education as well as gender. People have had to adjust — or not — to sexsit, and those whose privilege was once unchallenged have the hardest time. I laureate other prominent scientists who have similar feelings, some much younger than Hunt.
Trying to understand this nobel not mean sexist or approving. What this really demonstrates is how far from gender equality science is. Nobbel we want to make that trip, we nobel to start understanding this laureate response in otherwise intelligent men. Which brings me back to what science does best.
I suggest, though, sexist anyone looking at this psychological impact of social evolution should do it in a co-ed lab. Nnobel Latest Video Free. Ancient puppy found in permafrost still has its fur and whiskers Exclusive: Laureaye placed in suspended animation for the first time CO2-guzzling bacteria made in the lab could help sexist climate change Why the medicine you take could actually be bad for your health One in 16 US women were forced into having sex for the first nobel.
Global zexist emissions up 0. The inside story on nobe and other interstellar worlds Roma Agrawal: How to build a skyscraper Our incredible nobel The astonishing tale of Homo naledi Kaureate health: How nobel look after your microbiome Journeys to the moon: Sesist Apollo onwards.
Yet inconveniently falling in love with colleagues must be a problem for the women in the lab as well, especially when the males on offer are unreconstructed sexists. So having men in labs must be a problem too. But the woman will probably find out pretty quickly what it means not to be one of the boys.
What a capital idea! Girls do better in science in all-girl classes , so this may finally liberate the female intellectual power British science has been denied, for some reason, for so long. And the boys would be freed from the irritation of the girl labmates failing, for some reason, to fall in love with them. But logic demands we go further.
What about gay scientists? Maybe lesbians can work with straight males. But some straight males might frustratingly fall in love with lesbians. The gay guys could work with straight women, but we all know straight women are forever falling for them.
And what about bisexuals? Or as we now call them, women. Jennie Magill with her family in the background. Working mother Jennie Magill shopping with her children at the super market.
Jennie and Jim Magill in the kitchen. Jennie Magill and family in the kitchen. Caption from LIFE. Wifely kiss is Jim's reward for helping with the dishes. Jennie Magill at work. Companionable lunch with the girls from store is lots better, says Jennie, than a sandwich in solitude at home. Her work is a source of pride to Jim. And when I tell her about my work she doesn't brush it off. The ride home is a chance to talk without domestic distractions.
Jennie and Jim Magill coming home from work. Taking over the family reins when she gets home, Jennie holds Jackie, 2, who tests cake which he "helped" housekeeper Sophia Flewelling left to bake. Sophie runs household smoothly while parents are gone. Jennie Magill and family. Jennie Magill ironing with her daughter. But in later years, despite a complete lack of formal education in biology and genetics, Shockley tried to use these fields of study to support a set of racist ideas known as eugenics.
Kary Mullis, the winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, revels in his reputation as a "maverick. He has lent his Nobel Laureate star power to endorsing the theories of molecular biologist Peter Duesberg, who asserts—despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary—that the HIV virus is harmless and that AIDS is actually caused by recreational drug use and anti-HIV pharmaceuticals.
The Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to Fritz Haber, who had developed a method for synthesizing ammonia from nitrogen and hydrogen for use as fertilizer. But Haber would become known for another innovation: industrialized mass-killing. During the First World War, he initiated the program to develop and weaponize chlorine for use on the battlefield. On April 22, , Haber personally oversaw the deployment of 6, cylinders of gas at Ypres, Belgium, killing 1, French and Algerian troops in less than ten minutes.
Fritz Haber, the winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, reduced hunger worldwide with his invention of a process for making chemical fertilizer. His invention, the Solventil, was a solar valve that regulated the operation of gaslight. It would shut down a beacon at sunrise and automatically relight it again at night—or during the day, if conditions became cloudy or foggy. A nifty invention, to be sure, but not exactly paradigm-changing research—especially during an era when Max Planck and others were revolutionizing our understanding of physics.
It was later revealed that the academy originally had intended to offer a joint-prize to Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison for their contributions to developing electricity. Tesla, however, refused to share the honor with Edison. Some historical accounts say Tesla remained bitter over a financial disagreement with Edison; others say that Tesla considered it an affront to share the award with a mere inventor.
Three things happen when they are in the lab: you fall in love with them, they fall in love with you, and when you criticize them they cry.